this type of longitudinal study was only pos- much information as possible on the same sible thanks to a major effort to adapt the sample of students who, as time goes by, questionnaires and to monitor the schools get older and attend other Junior Achieve- and students over time in order to collect as ment Foundation programmes. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS • Scientific literature • World Values Survey • Centre for Sociological Research (CIS) Universidad DESIGN OF THE • Startup programme EVALUATION AND • Directivos por un día QUESTIONNAIRES COMPARISON RESULTS OBTAINED DISTRIBUTION • Overall findings of the Junior Achievement OF RESULTS programmes • 15/16, 16/17, 17/18 and 18/19 • Differentiation between programmes for primary academic years and secondary education • More than 24,900 surveys ׀.4. Programmes • Comparison of Junior Achievement programmes • 15 programmes included in the study • More than 380 schools CREATION This report summarises the results of the longitudinal evaluation of the following AND ANALYSIS 14 educational programmes OF RESULTS COMPILATION PRIMARY EDUCATION OF RESULTS • Our community • Our city • Our resources ANALYSIS OF THE SAMPLE SECONDARY EDUCATION • Systematisation of the responses • The advantages of staying in SECONDARY EDUCATION, obtained school A LEVELS AND VOCATIONAL • Creation of sample control • Climate entrepreneurship models • Your finances, your future TRAINING • Orienta-T • How does risk affect me? • Partners for a day • Skills for success • Minientrepreneurships 12٪٪٪UǼȬƇƤɅ٪ȷɅɍƫɬ JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT 13